<![CDATA[IOD Parc RSS Feed]]> http://www.iodparc.com 5 <![CDATA[ IOD PARC's Vijay Shrestha presented with a plaque recognising his work in the DFID-funded Livelihoods and Forestry Programme]]> http://www.iodparc.com/news/16/iod_parcs_vijay_shrestha_presented_with_plaque_by_the_uk_department_for_international_development.html Fri, 17 May 2013 00:00:00 +0100

The UK Department for International Development presented Vijay Shrestha, IOD PARC staff member based in Kathmandu, Nepal, with a plaque recognising his work as the Programme Manager for the successful Livelihoods and Forestry Programme on Friday 12th April. The programme ran from 2001 and built on the success of the UK's earlier engagement in the Nepal forest sector.  This presentation formed part of the celebrations of the 30 years of work done by the Centre for International Development and Training (University of Wolverhampton).

 The plaque recorded the following:

On 12 April 2013, we have gathered to show our appreciation to; 

VIJAYA NARAYAN SHRESTHA 

for his 25 years of work with the UK Department for International Development and his outstanding contributions to improve the lives of the poor and excluded through Forestry Sector Development in Nepal. 

We especially thank Vijaya for his leadership of the highly successful Nepal-UK Community Forestry Programme and Livelihoods and Forestry Programme. You have set the standard for excellence, dedication, and leadership. 

The success of Nepal’s Community Forestry Sector, recognised globally, owes much to you. You have inspired and mentored many, ensuring the next generation of community forestry leaders are ready to take up the challenges ahead.

Your contributions and successes will continue to inspire all of us.

On behalf of the management and staff at DFID Nepal, past and present, we wish you all the best in your future.

Dominic O'Neill

Head of DFID Nepal

]]>
<![CDATA[ IOD PARC support the launch of Sheffield Institute for International Development (SIID)]]> http://www.iodparc.com/news/15/iod_parc_support_the_launch_of_sheffield_institute_for_international_development_(siid).html Tue, 07 May 2013 00:00:00 +0100

Photograph by Craig Fleming 

IOD PARC company director Sheelagh O’Reilly joined a panel of leading practitioners, academics and campaigners at a public debate on the intersection of human rights, activism and international development at the launch of the Sheffield Institute for International Development (SIID) on 24th April at Sheffield City Hall.

The panel included Yasmin Hussein (Amnesty International Programme Director for International Advocacy), Professor Gordon Crawford (University of Leeds), Ben Rawlence (formerly of Human Rights Watch, Africa Division) and was chaired by Professor Uma Kothari of the University of Manchester. The discussion was lively and engaging, with topics ranging from the practicality of universal human rights, whether aid and development funding should be stopped to countries who breached human rights conventions, and the impact of social technologies on the practice of human rights activism and advocacy.

Sheelagh said:

“The launch of SIID provides an excellent opportunity to combine the development of theoretical understanding of the complex area that is global development with a truly grounded framework for implementation.  This is important as the combination of theory and practice can provide formidable evidence to support work to enable all humans to be able to lead dignified lives where basic rights of life, liberty and subsistence form the common ground of activism.   Within an increasingly connected world the issues of land rights, food rights and water availability for human and non-humans need to be addressed actively to ensure that the basic building blocks of a dignified life remain at the forefront of processes to facilitate an equitable and sustainable future for the planet.”  

The launch event had earlier seen Clare Short, former Secretary of State for International Development, take the stage to deliver a powerful speech, setting out her take on the context the new Institute is will be working within. The former Labour MP, who quit Tony Blair’s Government over the Iraq war, was guest of honour and urged the new institute to tackle the challenges of climate change, last stage capitalism and international social justice in a time of great geo-political upheaval across the globe. You can watch a participant filmed video of that speech here.

The Institute, which counts IOD PARC Director Mark Keen as an advisory board member, will be a flagship research centre that will work in collaboration with institutions, Non Governmental Organisations (NGOs) and partners from across the globe.

Vice Chancellor of the University of Sheffield Sir Keith Burnett said:

“The Institute plays a vital role by providing a broad understanding of international development among researchers and opinion makers, as well as to business leaders and the members of the public. Building on the academic skills that already exist within the University of Sheffield, the Institute for International Development will strengthen those skills further by recruiting internationally prominent guest researchers and establishing international research and education collaborations – an approach which will help us target our efforts in ways that really make a difference.

“The Sheffield Institute for International Development will also help to address a number of pressing international policy issues. The vision of the Institute is to become a leading International Centre of Excellence that attracts researchers from around the world and from a range of disciplines. These new ideas and networks will also benefit our research and teaching and provoke real change in the world.”

]]>
<![CDATA[ Special Issue of the Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation: The Paris Declaration Evaluation]]> http://www.iodparc.com/news/14/canadian_journal_of_program_evaluation_%E2%80%93_the_paris_declaration_evaluation_volume.html Thu, 25 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0100 IOD PARC staff member Julia Betts, in collaboration with Team Leader Bernard Wood, has jointly authored two articles in a Special Issue of the Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation dedicated to the Paris Declaration Evaluation.

 The first article, entitled The Paris Declaration Evaluation Process and Methods, describes the design, methodology and implementation of the Evaluation, when confronted with the challenge of assessing the effects of a policy compact between nations, and linking development results to the implementation of a broad reform agenda. It provides some lessons learned for complex transnational studies.

The second article, entitled Results of the Paris Declaration Evaluation, summarises the results of the Evaluation in terms of the relevance and implementation of the Declaration, its contributions to aid effectiveness and development results, the changing burdens of aid management, the added value of Paris Declaration-style development cooperation, and key implications for future aid effectiveness reforms.  The conclusions and recommendations of the synthesis report are presented.

 The journal can be found at:  http://evaluationcanada.ca/site.cgi?s=4&ss=21&_lang=en&volume=2012//3

]]>
<![CDATA[ 'Climate Justice: What is it?' Seminar]]> http://www.iodparc.com/news/13/climate_justice_what_is_it%3F_seminar.html Thu, 22 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0000
The seminar was hosted by the University of Aberdeen Centre for Sustainable International Development.  Presentations and a recording of the seminar can be found at: http://www.abdn.ac.uk/sustainable-international-development/events/1980/ ]]>
<![CDATA[ Meta Evaluation of Mine Action and Development]]> http://www.iodparc.com/news/12/meta_evaluation_of_mine_action_and_development.html Fri, 19 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0100 report published online.  ]]> <![CDATA[ American Evaluation Association's award for the Outstanding Evaluation of 2012]]> http://www.iodparc.com/news/11/american_evaluation_associations_award_for_the_outstanding_evaluation_of_2012.html Tue, 16 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0100 Normal 0 false false false EN-GB X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4

The Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness was endorsed in 2005 by over 150 countries and organisations. The Declaration was considered a landmark international agreement and the culmination of several decades of attempts to improve the quality of aid and its impact on development. It laid out a roadmap of 56 practical commitments. In 2008, the principles were reaffirmed and the Accra Agenda for Action added.

The Phase II evaluation of The Paris Declaration was the largest evaluation of international aid ever conducted. It involved more than 50 studies in 21 partner countries and across 18 donor agencies, a journey of more than a year, which led up to the High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness in Busan, in November 2011. The evaluation – which was trilingual – was managed by IOD PARC, who provided the Core International Team and project management function; designed the methodology; supported the production of the independent country and donor studies; and produced the final Synthesis report.

The Evaluation has won the American Evaluation Association’s award for the Outstanding Evaluation of 2012.  For more details please see: http://www.eval.org/aea12.awards.press.release.doc

]]>
<![CDATA[ Malawi Renewable Energy Acceleration Programme (Malawi-REAP)]]> http://www.iodparc.com/news/10/malawi-reap2.html Thu, 30 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0100 The Scottish Government commissioned a Scoping Study on Supporting Community Energy Development in Malawi in 2011 by IOD PARC and the University of Strathclyde. The outcomes of that study pointed to a set of projects that the Scottish Government might support as a programme.

Those recommendations have been taken forward in the form of the Malawi Renewable Energy Acceleration Programme (MREAP).  MREAP is managed by the University of Strathclyde, has seven main partners (including IOD PARC), is governed by a Programme Steering Group (co-chaired by the Government of Malawi Department of Energy Affairs and the University of Strathclyde) and is funded to the sum of £1.7m.  MREAP runs from January 2012 – March 2014.

IOD PARC is leading the Institutional Support Programme for Malawi-REAP, and as part of this we are doing the following;
  • Comparative evaluation of off-grid energy management interventions and identifying which are the most effective approaches overall, taking into account context, technical performance, cost effectiveness and social outcomes. Completed in May 2012.
  • Establishment of an inventory of off-grid installations and develop an M&E strategy in conjunction with RenewN’Able and WASHTed (Consulting arm of the Polytechnic in Blantyre, Malawi). Completed in May 2012.
  • Support to renewable energy and climate change policy development and enhanced participation in international climate change mechanisms. Ongoing.
  • Development of a monitoring and learning plan for MREAP including specific outputs on gender and vulnerable groups. Ongoing.

A draft version of the Evaluation of Off-grid Community Managed Renewable Energy Projects in Malawi by IOD PARC was released in time for Rio +20. Included in this draft are also a set of twelve case studies undertaken as part of the evaluation. All of these documents and more are information is available from the MREAP site on the University of Strathclyde’s Website.

]]>
<![CDATA[ Symposium on Climate Change and Political Violence]]> http://www.iodparc.com/news/8/symposium_on_climate_change_and_political_violence.html Mon, 12 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0000 Symposium on Climate Change and Political Violence was held at Edinburgh University with the support of IOD PARC and the University of Zurich.

This symposium explored how contested political contexts and environmental change collide. The Arab Spring has marked 2011 as a year of political transition. The events in the Middle East seem to reflect a new era of popular demand for democracy and rejection of entrenched authoritarian leaders. The sub-text to much of the political unrest, however, is the stark inequalities in income, access to opportunities, and the distribution of wealth from natural resources such as oil, gold, diamonds and other minerals, forests and agriculture. Such inequalities have significant implications not only for the ability of these societies to build lasting political stability, but also for creating positive responses to environmental and climatic change. From the torching of oil wells, to the shifts in access to common pool resources such as water and grazing land, violent political change has significant implications for ecosystems and the livelihoods of ordinary people. The inability to access resources and create resilient livelihoods, (along with a desire for less state repression), underpins many demands for greater political freedoms. Conversely, some insurgencies have unintentionally promoted the regeneration of forests, fisheries and other resources due to the threat of violence for people attempting to access such resources. 

Political change thus re-shapes the resources of states in profound, but often unpredictable ways, yet such changes remain on the periphery of analyses of contested politics. This symposium brought together scholars, development professionals and policy makers concerned about environment and development to debate the potential of contested political contexts to address and support efforts to mitigate and adapt to environmental changes, whether it be those caused by climate change, pollution from industrial extraction, or socio-ecological changes produced through agriculture, forestry and other livelihood strategies. The engagement of the international development community into ‘fragile’ states can be an important element in the shaping of post-conflict institutional and organisational development, but equally poses challenges for effective monitoring of the changes that the ‘aid’ community are promoting and the global politics associated with that. 

The questions addressed in this one-day intensive symposium included: 
  1. How do contentious politics transform the basic conditions of social existence through disruptions in property rights, access to and control over resources and changes in local social relations? 
  2. How do such shifts in resources and social existence offer opportunities and challenges for building stable post-conflict politics? 
  3. What are the consequences for post-conflict politics and development when ‘aid’ agencies promote particular solutions to environmental challenges (i.e. participatory governance, or payments for Ecosystem Services)? 

Organisers: Dr. Andrea Nightingale, Professor Tim Hayward, Dr. Liz Grant, Mr. Jake Broadhurst, Dr. Sheelagh O’Reilly (IOD PARC)

Keynote speaker: Professor Nancy Peluso, Henry J. Vaux Distinguished Professor of Forest Policy, Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management , University of California Berkeley

Host organisations: 


]]>
<![CDATA[ Trade Advocacy Fund Management, DFID]]> http://www.iodparc.com/news/7/trade_advocacy_fund_management_dfid.html Tue, 06 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0000 Trade Advocacy Trust Fund (TAF) for the Department for International Development (DFID). 

This fund focuses on providing support to developing countries to defend their interests and advocate for change within the global trading system. TAF support will be available over the next four years to governments from the Least Developed Countries, Low Income Countries and the Regional Economic Communities and aims to develop their capacity to participate more effectively in trade negotiations and resolve trade disputes. 

TAF will support this outcome by providing access to high quality analysis and advice; training and development for negotiators; and resources to sustain their participation in trade negotiations. This will be achieved by contracting the services of third party service providers. Services will be of a specialised nature and high quality will be paramount. Service providers will be registered, according to their qualifications, on the TAF Service Provider Database. Only registered service providers (firms, organisations and individuals) will be eligible to participate under TAF's procurement opportunities. 

TAF is currently recruiting in the following areas: 
  • Individual Consultants and Consultancy Firms interested in providing Trade Related Services under TAF. Consultancy Firms are expected to include law firms, training institutes, universities, think tanks, and other for-profit or not-for-profit organisations with relevant capability to undertake fee-for-service contracts on behalf of TAF. 
  • Individual Consultants to provide Coaching Support to grant applicants. These types of interventions will focus on working with TAF applicants to review/develop trade negotiations management and capacity building strategies and, if appropriate, identifying and articulating short and longer-term needs for technical, legal and logistical support through TAF and other capacity building modalities. TAF Coaching Support will be of short term duration, typically a maximum duration of 3-6 weeks, including potential field work. 

More details of the Fund and how it can be accessed are provided on the DFID website.

]]>
<![CDATA[ Malawi Renewable Energy Acceleration Programme (Malawi-REAP)]]> http://www.iodparc.com/news/6/malawi-reap.html Thu, 23 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0000 Following the Scottish Government's recent Press Release, IOD PARC are very pleased to announce that we are now working with the University of Strathclyde on the Malawi Renewable Energy Acceleration Programme. 

We would like to offer you a short summary of what this programme will entail.


Objective: 
Support Government of Malawi energy strategy by accelerating the growth of community and renewable energy development in Malawi through multiple, targeted and coordinated activities with good potential to provide a platform for that growth. 

Summary: 
The programme will include aspects of renewable energy development, community energy development, biomass strategy, rural electrification and underpinning institutional support and capacity building. These multiple sector development activities are organised as a coordinated single programme addressing the stated objective. 

A key focus of the programme will be the link between community energy and MDG progress. Specifically, the support mechanisms to empower disadvantaged Malawian communities to participate in addressing their own energy needs via sustainable energy solutions that deliver community wide development benefits, and also the systems and processes to monitor and evaluate the impact of these energy solutions with respect to the Malawian Growth and Development Strategy. 

The proposed programme has four main elements: 

1. Institutional Support Programme (lead partner IOD PARC
  • Undertake a comparative evaluation of off-grid energy management interventions and identify which are the most effective approaches overall, taking into account context, technical performance, cost effectiveness and social outcomes. 
  • Establish an inventory of off-grid installations and develop an M&E strategy in conjunction with the Community Energy Development Programme. 
  • Support renewable energy and climate change policy development and enhanced participation in international climate change mechanisms 

2. Community Energy Development Programme (lead partner Community Energy Scotland
  • Deliver a sustainable legacy of support mechanisms for community renewable energy in Malawi through the creation of a community energy support toolkit, support network and delivery organisation. 
  • Delivery of strategic community energy projects in different renewable energy technologies 
  • Establish an administered grant and loan facility for further community energy project development 
  • Implement M&E systems and processes and links to the national inventory 

3. Wind Energy Preparation Programme (lead partner Sgurr Energy
  • Initial feasibility study and capacity building with GoM Department of Energy Affairs regarding grid connected wind but with a consideration of the wider community benefits available from wind energy. 
  • Data collection at specific sites utilising 50-70m energy yield masts 
  • Detailed feasibility study for selected sites with specific focus on outlining further development process, best practice and recommendations for further work and studies 
  • Full ‘bankable’ level energy yield assessment and site classification for each selected site with a report suitable for presentation to potential investors/donors 

4. Renewable Energy Capacity Building Programme (lead partner UoM WASHted
  • Develop existing and new Malawi based Technician and Degree qualifications in renewable energy at both Mzuzu University and University of Malawi Polytechnic to improve the technical support capacity available to the community energy development programme 
  • Develop increased Malawian research capability and capacity for local postgraduate teaching with a focus on PhD study for Malawian academics linked to appropriate community energy projects 
  • Set up and support an energy entrepreneurship fund to attract graduates and others in the energy domain to undertake more risky business start up activity with a focus on technological innovation and community development in renewable energy 
  • Improve capability for monitoring and managing remote renewable energy installations initially focussing on supporting the community energy development programme
]]>
<![CDATA[ Learning to make space for qualitative indicators]]> http://www.iodparc.com/news/4/qualitative_indicators.html Fri, 15 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0100 here. ]]> <![CDATA[ Welcome to IOD PARC]]> http://www.iodparc.com/news/1/welcome_IOD_PARC.html Sun, 11 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0100 Welcome to ‘IOD PARC’!  After a lot of discussion, planning and effort we are pleased to present our new ‘brand’ and look.  The primary purpose of the rebranding has been to reflect that IOD and PARC have always been one organisation focusing on improving performance in International Development yet doing so by drawing from our roots in both Organisation Development and Monitoring and Evaluation.   We have also ‘grown’ both in size and in organisational maturity and we want to illustrate this in how we present ourselves and reaffirm our commitment to services based on good professional relationships and sound technical knowledge and expertise.

Please let us know what you think or if you’d like to know more…

]]>
<![CDATA[ Ethics and Evaluation]]> http://www.iodparc.com/news/2/ethics_note.html Sun, 11 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0100 Few of us involved in the practice of development evaluation have had the opportunity to study ethics. Indeed, the word "ethics" can sometimes invoke a Pandora's box of issues that threaten to further complicate the already complex business of determing impact.

But evaluators are, by nature, involved in a moral pursuit.  
Development ultimately derives it's legitimacy from action, not talk.  
So it stands to reason that bringing about more and better impact - the main occupation of evaluation - is ethical. Right?

This reasoning has seemed good enough for most evaluation up until now. After all, there seem to be limited opportunities for causing much ethical damage with key informant interviews and aggregating management numbers. In recent times, however, the quest for evidence has taken a different turn. Several significant actors in development evaluation are looking more and more at the type of evidence generated by clinical-style randomised evaluations.

Control trials change the ethical game. Suddenly there are claims of serious unethical consequences from the process of evaluation. Pitted against this is the claim that these randomised approaches will result in more money reaching more people in more beneficial ways. Few of us are well equipped to grapple with this conundrum.

We wanted to understand the issue of ethics in randomisation better, not so that we could decide which side of the debate is right, but to get a feeling for whether real life development organsiations have the capability to handle these new demands.

To achieve this we had to start by building an analytical framework that would let us to understand how ethics and evaluation interact in development organisations. This framework turned out to be a useful tool for demystifying different organisational cultures around ethics in evaluation.

We present this framework in our first learning product on the issue of ethics in evaluation. A forthcoming complementary piece will then look deeper at what we found when we used this framework to look at two major users of development evaluation.

]]>